Hipponax and Misogyny in Ancient Greece

Edit

Article

by
published on 18 January 2012

It has always been recognized that women in the ancient world were considered only a little higher in value than the man’s cattle or plow and, sometimes, not even accorded that kind of respect. Examples of misogynistic attitudes toward women can be seen in certain works from Mesopotamia or Egypt but, in these cultures, women were generally respected and even enjoyed a degree of equal rights. In the work of the Greek poet Hipponax of Ephesus, however, misogyny reaches heights unequaled in any other writing.

Hipponax (c. 540 BCE) is known as a satirist with a “malicious disposition” but, if his work on women is supposed to be in any way funny, it misses the mark completely. It is little wonder that he was exiled from his hometown of Ephesus and finally died in poverty.

D. Brendan Nagle and Stanley M. Burnstein in their work The Ancient World: Readings in Social and Cultural History, include in their section, Husbands, Wives and Slaves: The Domestic Foundations of the Polis, Hipponax’s piece, “If Only We Could Reproduce Without Woman…!” which clearly demonstrates the misogynistic attitude of the time and makes women seem unappreciated and worthless. There is not a single point in the piece where women are talked about positively. As stated, women were typically only seen valuable for their ability to reproduce and to maintain a household, but a modern reader cannot fully realize how poorly women were regarded until experiencing this piece of writing.

The poet Hipponax wrote, “Two days are sweetest for a woman, the day a man marries her and the day he carries her out dead”. This statement is extremely degrading, especially because these ideas and beliefs were kept for so long, even if they were not believed to the extent that Hipponax represents. Even to this day some men still do not believe in the equality between males and females.

Some modern readers may believe that this idea of the unimportance of women in ancient Greece is not that degrading because, in today’s society, most people do not think this way. Such readers also may actually believe that the way women are described in the text is a good representation of the characteristics of women. The stereotypes of women may be correct to some extent, but they are extravagantly cruel and, further, anyone could think of plenty male attributes and relate them coarsely to the characteristics of animals representing men.

A break down of the female characteristics that are represented in the text is quite interesting.  First the pig is used to represent women. Hipponax is describing a woman as a slob that has no respect for herself and her self-appearance. Then comes the fox, which is described as being sly and unpredictable and then, most offensive, is the dog, also known as the bitch. The dog is supposed to reproduce over and over again and is annoying because she is in everyone’s business and always wants to be heard. Nobody can shut the woman up whether she is treated nicely or beaten.

Hipponax’s depiction of woman as the sea is the most accurate representation of women, because a woman’s moods and temperaments do tend to change quite frequently. This is the only representation that a modern reader might actually agree with. Yet this reasonable pause is brief and the list continues on describing a woman as the ass, weasel, horse, and the ape until reaching the conclusion that “Zeus made this the greatest pain of all: Woman”. The nicest `type’ of woman this poet can manage is the bee but cannot help but say, “Good luck in finding such a woman” as he goes on to describe a woman who is only a “loving wife beside her loving man” who will bear “illustrious and handsome children”. For most people, however, the bee is synonymous with a sting.

However, thanks to the grim contrivances of Zeus, women are here to stay by man’s side forever, no matter what, and Hipponax and those like him will simply have to deal with that.



Hipponax and Misogyny in Ancient Greece Books

 

Comments

comments powered by Disqus
  • Angie wrote on 23 October 2011 at 01:56:

    This article conflates two archaic Iambists: Hipponax and Semonides. While it provides an interesting viewpoint on the utility of the misogynistic tradition, it is NOT a good source for information about either poet.

  • Jan van der Crabben wrote on 03 October 2010 at 14:39:

    This is a very interesting essay on misogyny in Ancient Greece. In order to comply with the factual format of Ancientopedia, I have removed several parts of argumentation from this essay. Even though the argumentation was good, the goal of the Encyclopedia is to be factual, not argumentative.

Advertisement

Newsletter

Sign up for our newsletter:

Recommended

Advertisement