Homo naledi is an extinct species of human discovered in Rising Star Cave in South Africa in 2013 CE in what has become the biggest single-species hominin find in Africa to this day. More than 1500 fossils that once belonged to the living bodies of at least 15 individuals were painstakingly removed from a very inaccessible part of the cave. In a breath of fresh air, the project, led by palaeontologist Lee Berger, not only presented its results in open access fashion but even allowed the world to watch over their shoulders as social media and a live blog by National Geographic kept track of the excavation process.
Homo naledi were short and small, with small skulls, and skeletons showing a mixture of features, some resembling the Australopithecines, while others are more humanlike, such as the hands and feet. Up until recently, scientists had not managed to date these bones, and the strange, mixed picture presented by them led to a wide span of possible dates, including some pointing to Homo naledi being around two million years old. However, a paper published on May 9th, 2017 CE by members involved in the excavations, finally released us all from a tortuous wait and succeeded in dating the remains: they are only between 236,000 and 335,000 years old, a lot younger than we all thought. Naledi thus shared Africa with modern human ancestors who were also trudging around at that time, and its date indicates that skeletal clues alone are not a very reliable way of estimating a fossil’s age, especially if only certain fragments remain. A reassessment of other early hominin fossils might thus well be needed.
In August 2013 CE, palaeontologist Lee Berger from the University of Witwatersrand, South Africa, took a punt and sent former student and caving buddy Pedro Boshoff off on an exploration job. Pedro brought in recreational cavers Rick Hunter and Steven Tucker, who struck bone when they delved deep into the Rising Star cave system to a chamber some 30 meters under the surface. After seeing pictures and supposedly cursing (from excitement), Berger and his at that time 14-year-old son Matthew were given a tour. Matthew, slender enough to fit through the very tight squeeze into the chamber, photographed the bones and showed his dad, who confirmed they were indeed human.
Not long after the start of the excavations, Hunter and Tucker followed a sloping passage into another section of the cave, more than 100 metres of twists and turns apart underground from the first chamber, and stumbled upon even more bones. The first chamber was named Dinaledi ('stars' in Sesotho), and the second one Lesedi ('light' in Setswana).
With such an exciting find, it would have been unfair if the bones had been a breeze to recover, so it is a good thing the cave itself threw the researchers a bit of a curve ball.
To reach the Dinaledi chamber, one had to overcome an obstacle course the army would have been proud of. After entering and descending along a narrow, downward-winding passage, squeezing between the rocks, and going down a ladder (installed for the purpose of this dig), the first choke point is reached. Known as Superman’s Crawl and extending for 7 metres, almost everyone has to crawl with one arm extended over their heads to get through. After a little more open bit, Dragon’s Back looms ahead - a nearly 20-metre long ascent marked by a series of scale-like flat rocks jagging up. A metre-wide gap then has to be crossed before reaching the 18 cm wide slot that forms the entrance into the chamber more than 50 meters below.
With these conditions in mind (any kind of body fat would likely leave you permanently sandwiched between the rock walls), Berger sent out a Facebook casting call for experienced palaeontologists who were skinny and not claustrophobic. The six that were chosen to do the excavation work happened to be all women: Marina Elliott, Lindsay Eaves, Elen Feuerriegel, Alia Gurtov, Hannah Morris and Becca Peixotto, who became known as the 'underground astronauts'.
The two chambers were basically littered with bones, probably not all of which have as of yet been recovered. Making up at least 15 individuals in the Dinaledi chamber and what looks like two adults and a juvenile in the Lesedi chamber (which is still undated), they all belonged to Homo naledi.
Naledi’s eclectic collection of features is overturning the way we thought species worked. They were small humans, with one of the individuals estimated to have been around 146cms - making them taller than Australopithecus but not as tall as Homo erectus - and the average estimated weight comes in between c. 40kg and 56kg. Their skulls were small - coming in between c. 560 cc and 465 cc while the skull found in the Lesedi chamber was slightly larger a 610 cc - even for their stature and reminiscent of Australopithecus brains. However, Naledi’s skull shape, including the jaw and teeth, looks like that of early Homo species such as Erectus, Habilis or Rudolfensis. The human trend is continued in their nimble hands (with remarkably curved fingers) and wrists, the spine, and very human-like foot and lower limb. In a confusing contrast, again, Homo naledi’s flaring pelvis, wide ribcage and shoulders are more similar to Australopithecus.
Because they clearly walked upright and had hands dextrous enough to theoretically smash out some tools (though none have been found in the cave), and had a Homo-esque skull shape with small teeth, their assumed lifestyle pushes them into the genus Homo rather than Australopithecus.
Interpreting the find
But where do Homo naledi’s origins lie? Berger thinks that its branch within the hominin tree must be at least 900,000 years old, and probably even older. He and his team see three possible origin stories. Firstly, their origins may lie somewhere along the as of yet confusing tangle of branches that also lead to Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis, Homo Floresiensis, and Australopithecus sediba. Secondly, they may be a sister group to Homo erectus and other big-headed Homo, including ourselves – Sapiens. Thirdly, a sisterly connection with a group that spans Homo sapiens, Homo antecessor, and other so-called archaic humans is possible. Naledi’s mosaic anatomy might be the result of an early mixing of a particularly stubborn australopith surviving until a later point than most of its peers and a more human-like population, with Naledi sticking around for ages after this early hybridisation.
Naledi’s bones suggest that these humans were probably not very original with regard to their lifestyle, but clambered about their environment in a way similar to Sapiens and Erectus. A recent study found small chips in Naledi’s teeth; it might have chewed on tough foods, perhaps contaminated with grit. Aiding their teeth, although no tools have been discovered in the Rising Star Cave as of yet, Homo naledi’s hands show it could at least theoretically have played with tools. With its shocker of a date – the bones come in between 236,000-335,000 years old – it may even be the only human discovered so far that we know was actually around in South Africa around the time that Middle Stone Age tools found in that same chunk of the world were created.
What is left is the enigma of how on earth these bones ended up in such a weirdly inaccessible part of the cave. Research has shown that the Dinaledi chamber was most likely just as hard to reach back in Naledi’s day, and, importantly, the lack of sudden openings means it was not some sort of death trap into which people tumbled to their demise. The cave’s sediment tells us there is also no evidence of the bones being moved from one part of the cave to another by a rush of water. The bones moreover show no sign of being gnawed up by predators, or cut-marked by other humans, who might otherwise have dragged them into the cave. The Lesedi material ties in with all of this, too. Instead, the only reasonable explanation seems to be that these people were intentionally buried. Whether or not these burials came from a symbolic background is unknown; reasons for burial can range from simply wanting to stick rotting bodies far away from your dinner table to make sure curious cave lions would not show up, to more social and symbolic kinds of reasons.
Implications for our view on hominin evolution
Homo naledi’s recent date is a bit of an eye-opener in the context of human evolution at that point in time. It has overturned the previously widespread idea that humans showing these sorts of primitive features did not survive anywhere near this long and helps explain the also rebellious (and short) Homo floresiensis. It also means that you cannot reliably stick a date on a species if only certain parts of the skeleton have been found – imagine if we had only found Naledi’s shoulders and ribcage and missed all of its more human-like features. A reassessment of old fossils that may have fallen into this trap is thus not at all a bad idea. It is now clear that several quite distinct human populations were trudging around tropical and subequatorial Africa, with different-looking humans overlapping in time. Diversity is thus clearly a very, very important word in the evolutionary journey of Homo.
About the Author
- Berger, Lee, Almost Human (National Geographic, 2017).
- Berger, Lee R e.a., "Homo naledi and Pleistocene hominin evolution in subequatorial Africa," eLife 2017;6:e24234.
- Berger, Lee R e.a., "Homo naledi, a new species of the genus Homo from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa," eLife 2015;4:e09560.
- Dirks, Paul HGM e.a., "The age of Homo naledi and associated sediments in the Rising Star Cave, South Africa," eLife 2017;6:e24231.
- Hawks, John e.a., "New fossil remains of Homo naledi from the Lesedi Chamber, South Africa," eLife 2017;6:e24232.
- Towle, Ian, Joel D. Irish, and Isabelle De Groote, "Behavioral inferences from the high levels of dental chipping in Homo naledi," American Journal of Physical Anthropology Early View, 10.1002/ajpa.23250.
Cite This Work
Groeneveld, E. (2017, July 14). Homo naledi. Ancient History Encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://www.ancient.eu/Homo_Naledi/
Groeneveld, Emma. "Homo naledi." Ancient History Encyclopedia. Last modified July 14, 2017. http://www.ancient.eu/Homo_Naledi/.
Groeneveld, Emma. "Homo naledi." Ancient History Encyclopedia. Ancient History Encyclopedia, 14 Jul 2017. Web. 28 Jul 2017.